Tokenized Deposits vs. Stablecoins: Which is Better for Digital Payments? (2026)

The world of digital payments is a complex and ever-evolving landscape, and the latest insights from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) offer a fascinating glimpse into the future of money. In a recent speech, BIS General Manager Pablo Hernández de Cos made a compelling case for tokenized deposits as a superior alternative to stablecoins in the realm of digital payments.

The Case for Tokenized Deposits

De Cos argues that tokenized deposits, which are account-based bank liabilities, have several advantages over stablecoins. Firstly, they preserve the concept of singleness, meaning they can be redeemed at par into central bank money, a crucial aspect of a stable monetary system. This is a significant challenge for stablecoins, which often face issues with enforcing singleness and may require selling one type of stablecoin to purchase another, potentially at a loss.

Tokenized deposits, on the other hand, are more interoperable across different platforms and chains. While stablecoins may struggle to work seamlessly on various chains, tokenized deposits, when backed by tokenized central bank reserves, can become more fungible and interoperable between banks. This interoperability is essential for the widespread adoption of digital payments.

Financial Integrity and Supervision

Another critical aspect highlighted by de Cos is financial integrity. Stablecoins, he notes, are often held in self-custodied wallets, making it challenging to enforce anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) rules. Tokenized deposits, being account-based and supervised, provide a more structured and regulated environment, making it easier to manage these critical financial integrity concerns.

The Future of Money

While de Cos acknowledges that stablecoins have their place in the digital payments ecosystem, he emphasizes that they currently fall short of the foundational properties of money. He states, 'These contrasts do not prejudge outcomes, but they do indicate that, in their current form, stablecoins do not yet uphold the foundational properties of money. Notable gaps would need to be closed to approach the 'no-questions-asked' standard of money.'

The BIS General Manager's speech highlights the ongoing debate and evolution of digital payments and the potential for tokenized deposits to play a pivotal role in shaping the future of money. As the industry continues to innovate, it is essential to consider the broader implications and ensure that the monetary system remains stable and secure.

Tokenized Deposits vs. Stablecoins: Which is Better for Digital Payments? (2026)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Tyson Zemlak

Last Updated:

Views: 5882

Rating: 4.2 / 5 (63 voted)

Reviews: 94% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Tyson Zemlak

Birthday: 1992-03-17

Address: Apt. 662 96191 Quigley Dam, Kubview, MA 42013

Phone: +441678032891

Job: Community-Services Orchestrator

Hobby: Coffee roasting, Calligraphy, Metalworking, Fashion, Vehicle restoration, Shopping, Photography

Introduction: My name is Tyson Zemlak, I am a excited, light, sparkling, super, open, fair, magnificent person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.